Friday, October 26, 2007

Be part of the solution...

Be part of the solution...

Residents of North Minneapolis - please leave your comments and suggestions for improving our community..
Be part for the solution.
Be involved.
Tell your neighbors. Email us for a pdf of a flyer to distribute.

Together we can make a difference
this is a grass roots effort by homeowners, and concerned citizens to create change.

Join your neighbors for the next meeting of the Northside Homeowners' Association and find out what actions we've taken so far and what we are going to do next.

Northside Homeowners' Association meeting
Monday, November 12th 6:30-8:30 p.m.
Folwell Park Recreation Center

NHA full minutes from Oct. 22, 2007 meeting

Northside Homeowners' Association
October 22, 2007, 6:30 pm, Folwell Park Meeting Room 3

Start at 6:32 pm

Margarette Nevalainen and Anne McCandless will serve on Steering Committee. Alex Dobe will come over and see what he can do to help. John Mizyk will help put out flyers.

During introductions, Robert asked people were asked to state what their neighborhood concerns are: Overall livability a big concern; Livability; from NE, just observing; increase of muggings going unreported; Vandalism; next-door neighbors at 3238, stolen van; crime & livability, trash, problem properties; trash, shootings on Lowry, boarded houses; crime, problem properties, bad neighbors; crime, shootings; home ownership affordability issues, Level of violent crime; here to see if our concerns overlap-Lots of new people. Robert did a synopsis w/how this came together to explain why we are all here and why NHA need to be undertaken as a mandate for change.

History of prior conversation with Barb Johnson about what we could do about problems in our community specifically about the amount of subsidized housing on north , She said the only thing that would change anything is a “lawsuit”. Started doing some research and NM has 42% of Section 8 housing and 48% of entire rental in city. And More research about concentration of poverty, subsidized housing and how it attributes to crime, along with reading the mandates and research set out in the Hollman settlement, and subsequent documents, lead him to believe the city of Mpls. is doing the residents of North Mpls. a huge disservice. Particularly those of us who are homeowners. And have direct property value and livability impacts. .
To community development,.
Robert reviewed an overall structure of plan having discussions to create a plan of action or mandate for change document, in previous meeting started and this will add and review past. As the community involvement grows, and suggestions are added to document. Either thru meetings or on blog site email.

To be reviewed etc.. before we send to city as a mandate for change with a petition.

We reviewed the purpose which was set forth in prior meeting, ,asked for any new suggestions

. Our purpose: to mandate change in City and MPHA policy.

Lots of other organizations working to combat the same issues but as a HO Assn, because we live and own property here, we are more directly impacted in ways the city isn’t properly considering.

Reviewed concerns.
We are concerned about
-Impact of depreciating property values
-Increased concentration of crime, especially youth crime.

And moved on to what we want to do reviewed past added a few.
What we want to do:
-Prevent flight of responsible homeowners
-Increase responsible homeownership and landlords
brief conversation on what is a section 8 voucher, and other HUD/MPHA programs,.
Clarify subsidized housing: Section 8 voucher programs.
Do houses that city of Mineapolis owns in scattered site programs belong under Section 8? Yes.
Evidence shows that scattered sites are better managed. Than THE Neighborhood voucher holders.

The conversation moved toward gentrification..
We need to be aware of the differences between Poverty vs. its opposite / gentrification. We don’t think N Mpls will become Linden Hills but we should promote homeownership. We want to get back to being a Middle Class Working Neighborhood that is open to all people. Where does it say that poor people have to live in crappy housing, live in trash, with crime etc?
Let’s turn into homeowner-based housing. Harrison Neighborhood is developing a Code of Ethics. When tenants are bad, they get a letter; when they’re bad again, the landlord gets a letter. They’re following up and following up with penalties.

Mary’s Place … when they move out and have to take a Renter’s Course. Why doesn’t MPHA offer/require the same thing with education on how to live in a community, basic home maintenance, etc.

Thus Code of conduct, a code of ethics or neighborhood standards suggestion.
More review and education and more follow up with voucher holders as well as renters
And landlords for that matter.
There has to be stronger enforcement. Landlords and agencies tend to try to work with tenants so they don’t lose their benefits but this often works against the livability of neighbors. The Code of Conduct would be grounded in basic laws and ordinances already in existence.

People who come into section 8 are typically single moms who’ve been on a waiting list for six years sleeping on couches, living w/family members, etc. and sometimes come with a bad attitude and without education on how to be effective community members.

This isn’t an attack on Section 8 but there does have to be education and de-concentration. There aren’t enough homeowners in North Mpls to make a big enough difference. It’s difficult for landlords to get rid of problem tenants; at least section 8 is regulated.

Not really! There’s a lack of accountability from bad landlords and bad tenants.

Suggestion: more accountability on landlords, we reviewed other previously added suggestions to curtail that .

Anne McCandless, Jordan, just finished on a study with CURA intern on foreclosures. It’s not all about poor people who can’t keep up but it’s about investors, too. North Mpls turns over to rental three times faster than other parts of the city.

Cindy Fossum said Heritage Park is not 75% homeownership. Anne McCandless suggests a lawsuit against the city for not keeping their end of the Holman decision. How do we use that Holman decree in our favor to de-concentrate the poverty, section 8, etc. The jobs for the low-income people are out in the suburbs, why not the housing, too?

Robert form Hollman research:
When the projects were torn down, 90% of the 748 families who were displaced moved within a 3-mile radius of that area. There is precedent and research to support a lawsuit.
Thus maintaining and re-affirming that Hollman, was a total failure. From Research study report by Joyce Any level of subsidized housing over 20% directly impacts livability and brings property values down.

Reviewed and reaffirmed by community members the need to FIX:
Best thing is to de-concentrate the subsidized housing
De-concentrating poverty reduces crime and helps people get people out of poverty.
Review license, Zoning laws,
De-concentrating public housing out of at-risk neighborhoods.

Something has to stop the influx of section 8 and rental property … JACC is back down below 50% homeownership; how can we halt rental licenses?

There are several types of vouchers; sticky (not geographical based), seniors, disabled, scattered site, opportunity to work, etc. HUD doesn’t have much say in where some of these voucher holders decide to live. Transferable vouchers allow bad landlords to move bad tenants to another of his/her properties and continue to collect the govt. funds. MPHA has power to enforce certain guidelines but they don’t have the people to do it.


Discussion on inspection policy:
It looks like inspectors and city are going after smaller petty issues like plants overgrowing the sidewalk instead of the major issues of drug dealing and prostitution.

What about asking landlords to make a lease that also deals with behavioral issues? Would there be a precedent for the city to make a mandate to the rental property owners? CCP/SAFE has an addendum for landlords to include in their lease and do better background checks, if they choose.
Another solution: Making more homes owner-occupied is part of the solution.

Agreed that there was a need to increase Non-homestead property taxes is too low in ratio to the homestead. Increase non-homestead taxes to cover the expense of policing and patrolling the rental properties.

Suggestion: could landlord and rental owner workshops become mandatory along with rental license renewal?
Brian talked about OH Problem Properties Committee and how they work with 4th Precinct and Inspections. Worst problems aren’t Section 8 but investor landlords who skim rent and let house go to foreclosure.

How could the City improve on the rental license process? The fee should be raised and the process to revoke needs to be lessened. Connie cited an example on her block that took two years of constant reporting and loose enforcement.

Why doesn’t the city raise the rental license fee? What we’re looking at is a way to entice more homeownership and prevent turning single-family homes into rentals. Many investors chop the houses up to make more bedrooms and for more rent.

Considering the hassle the city goes through with all the rental properties, those expenses could be recouped in a higher license fee and property taxes and less on resident homeowners.
Robert reviewed last meeting and Barb Johnson -city is looking at a conversion fee for turning a single-family home into a rental property.

Most people feel the rental license fee is currently too low.
And new structure needed.

Discussion of Tenant Escrow Account for problem landlords: City of Minneapolis. has one but it’s extremely under used.
Joe Mullery discussed the Tenant Remedies Act is a state law that protects tenants. Is there any way to simplify the process. Tenant can escrow the rent if landlord isn’t keeping property up.

On judicial changes:
Make the unlawful detainer process easier and less costly for landlord to get rid of bad tenants. Two offense convictions are required to trigger an eviction.

Another suggestion: Put pressure on judges to accept a preponderance of evidence instead of convictions – use experts who can equate observances by neighbors with likelihood of criminal conduct. Enforce the Nuisance Act w/Hennepin County Attorney.

Discussion of what 4 PAC is up to (which has a link on blog)
Go to www.4pac.org where you can list problem properties – inspections, criminal, etc. and put address and what you’ve observed. This keeps a log of neighbor observations so if and when the attorney can print out that whole log. This is not 911 or 311 log; it’s a different mechanism for use by prosecutors to get more information. Ordinary people can also search by address. Also, would be helpful with capability to gather info on prospective tenants.

Write to John.choi@ci.stpaul.mn.us re new gang legislation.

Brian suggestion: and talk about Inspections. If after a period of time, city could non-compliant fee so city does it. Currently, only does it for grass cutting, trash, etc. Once it’s declared, city always just comes and cleans it and puts it on the taxes. This would also involve escrowing funds to make sure payments are made.

Suggestion: Also dedicate a noise enforcement unit in police department to enforce that ordinance. It’s only a misdemeanor to fire a gun even if a minor is nearby. We should work for an ordinance to increase the penalty. With fireworks too… This would change the priority.

On foreclosures:
Can anything be done with contract-for-deeds? They’re required to be registered with the county within a period for time and there is a provision that no one ever uses that cans knick the owner of the property 2% of the price of the contract as a fine. But they never do it because they’re just happy to get them registered. Warranty Deeds aren’t held to this same standard. Linda talked about changes to the foreclosure laws right now. Linda admitted that the amount of c for d’s and deed leans go un-accounted for and unregistered by state.

Robert side note about impact of foreclosures. From a UBS research study on foreclosures, recent predictions that before the dust settles on foreclosure issue, property values will be deflated by 30 to 40% from 2004 levels ending in 2009.

Linda: Most important thing is to look at things that increase the cost of doing business for problem properties. Looking at the amount of time the courts can drag things out transitioning from rental to homeownership will take a long time to affect change.

Suggestion: Excessive consumption fee in other municipalities could work here similar to false alarm fees. Can’t run it just off 911 calls because landlords tell renters not to call. Businesses get called on the rug for excessive calls. Make police make a better record of calls … like a check box on the form as a nuisance call.

Suggestion: Follow up from city officials on 911 calls to properties SO that the police and city officials actually follow up with the caller with an evaluation type call.


Linda Higgins the definition of what is an impacted community: Impacted = over 40% poverty. McKinley is only Northside community.

Back to talk of a lawsuit: Basis would be the city has so poorly mismanaged our community that we’ve been impacted unfairly with loss in value and livability.

Become a whole Northside initiative. Lawsuit against the City? Section 8 isn’t the core of the problem … it’s general problem rental properties so don’t focus on that. Precedent is that the city hasn’t treated the Northside fairly.
We can ask for stats from MPHA and ask for a commitment to reduce the number of section 8 rentals in our community.

Just for fun: a show of hands was offered, would you sign up on a class action lawsuit against the city to make change. Nearly the whole room, more than 80%
Agreed to support action.

From Linda, 17,202 rental licenses in city 2,500 in Northside from Barb at last meeting.

Suggestion Involve “good” landlords in this association. Change the license fees … have to have some relevance to the cost of doing business. Even a dog license is $50. It should be high enough to recoup the cost of inspections and services.

Another suggestion: Multiple property owners should pay even higher fees.

How do we make it more attractive for homeowners instead of investors? Push North Mpls as a place to build green. Marketing strategy?


NEW TOPIC: Structure of the Assn:

NHA As promotion tool: We might explore ways to mentor new neighbors into the Northside and talk up our neighborhood more to de-mystify and de-bunk the negative image the media portrays of us.

A great thing to do as a Homeowners Assn … window clings, “Proud Northside Resident”, give our names to realtors who support homeownership to talk to prospective buyers.
What would you like to see as members of the community in a homeowner’s assn?
Question asked what we are doing to promote the NHA, Robert Article in Camden News and Robert is trying sent info To north News, other NHO’s and other leadership in community
How do we reach the rest of the homeowners? We all tell 10 more people.
More press going out
Call for volunteers.
Steering committee
Legal committee
Outreach committee to get info information about stores, churches, trash schedule, and bus schedule, everything around here.

City or nhood code of conduct, window stickers that you signed on to the code. Jordan, OH, McKinley


Another idea is a Homeowners bill of rights.

Who else wants to get involved in forming the organization and developing a plan of action?

Could we hook up with Folwell? Yes quite possibly. We could have a discussion to going under the Folwell Center for Urban Initiatives.

Next Meeting is November 12th and will have been in the Camden & North News so should have more people involved. But we need steering committees to get the organizing work done.

Legal Research.
Membership outreach. Steering committee. Welcome committee.
For next meeting:
Push more that it’s entire Northside and not just north of Lowry. Entire Northside is impacted so all should be involved.
Question: how is this different from block club?
A Larger group has more impact on larger problems while block clubs focus on specific issues.
How to involve communities of color? We need helpers to spread the word.
Try thru church orgs.


Robert again explained the so grass roots nature of this org, with no funding and a skeleton crew at the helm as we get going; word of mouth has been difficult
Again please spread the word..
This is an issue for all.

Next Meeting: Monday, November 12th, 6:30 pm in Multi-Purpose Room. Folwell community center.

Form a Steering Committee to work on initiatives and plans to get landlords to the table to meet sometime before next meeting: Anne McCandless, Robert, Connie,

Biggest chore right now is telling your neighbors. Everyone tell 10 people. Make a flyer for people to copy and hand out. It will be mailed and sent to the blog site.

Watch November 16th on NOW on PBS a show on foreclosure issue in Folwell.

End at 8:50 pm.

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Be part of the solution...

Residents of North Minneapolis - please leave your comments and suggestions.
Be part for the solution.
Be involved.
Talk to your neighbor.
Together we can make a difference.


Join your neighbors for the next meeting of the Northside Homeowners' Association and find out what actions we've taken so far and what we are going to do next.

Northside Homeowners' Association meeting
Monday, November 12th 6:30-8:30 p.m.
Folwell Park Recreation Center
Multi-purpose Room

Thursday, October 11, 2007

complete minutes 1st meeting 10-8-07

Greeting fellow Northsiders as you can see, we are on our way and the grass of this grass roots campaign has been tossed on the ground and awaiting more water. Please review our meeting minutes and mission.

We have created a blog site which anyone can post to about the issues concerning our community, discuss solutions , successes, ideas for this newly forming NHA and want input on how we can move forward and create positive momentum.

Please pass this on and move it forward to fellow neighbors and concerned citizens of our community and have them contact us to be sure they are on the email list.

Next scheduled meeting:
Monday, October 22, 2007
Folwell Park Rec Center
Meeting room 3
6:30 to 8:30 p.m.

Northside Homeowners’ Association
Email: northsidehomeowners@gmail.com

Blog: http://northsidehomeowners.blogspot.com/


Synopsis of the Northside Homeowners’ Association
Initial Meeting,
Monday, October 8, 2007

Who we are:
We are concerned citizens of the Northside communities. We are homeowners who are concerned about our community and want to promote it for the positive. As homeowners in North Minneapolis, we have a vested interest in creating a safe and stable environment.

We are concerned by the:
• Impact of depreciating property values
• Impact of increased concentration of crime, especially youth crime


We want:
• To improve the livability of the Northside communities.
• Mandate a change in the way subsidized housing is concentrated in at risk neighborhoods.
• To maintain a manageable level of homeownership
• Prevent flight of responsible homeowners from Northside communities.
• Create a safe and stable community.
• Entice responsible homeownership and landlords
• Be a conduit to potential new homebuyers.

Some suggestions for change from our meeting:
• Rental property license fees
• Single Family Conversion fee
• To reduce the fee of an unlawful detainer
• Review tenant escrow account for problem landlords
• Conditional use permit
• City promote more homeownership programs for low income people

We will create a fact sheet on dealing with trouble properties, as a homeowner,
list of names numbers of city people who you can call to create action.


Next scheduled meeting:
Monday, October 22, 2007
Folwell Park Rec Center
Meeting room 3
6:30 to 8:30 p.m.

Northside Homeowners’ Association
Email: northsidehomeowners@gmail.com
Blog: http://northsidehomeowners.blogspot.com/



Northside Homeowner’s Association Minutes 10-8-07 (full minutes)

Introductions:
Robert Johnson & Jeanne Fish, 3435 James; Connie Beckers, 3243 Girard; Rebecca Hrobak, 4143 Russell; Nate & Martha Hrobak, 3310 Sheridan; Roberta Englund, Folwell/Webber & Folwell Center for Urban Initiatives (uses non-public dollars to create change); Barb Johnson, City Council; Cheryl Sanderson, 36th& Knox; Terry K??? 23rd & Upton; Kelly Marthwick (?), 3500 James; Angie, 3430 James; Trevor & Karin Tonseth, 32xx Sheridan; Kris Brogan, Papa’s; Dean Ottman, 3438 James; Guy on corner of 3559 James.

Purpose of meeting:
Connie had problems on her block this summer and worked closely with Ron McConnell, para-legal for the City Attorney’s office on some solutions. But the problem tenants moved to 33rd & James and became someone else’s problem. Connie invited folks from 33rd & James and Robert & Jeanne to come to their block club meeting for some advice on dealing with them. At that meeting,
Robert shared some of his ideas and a conversation w/Barb Johnson about change needed on the Northside.

Robert has done a lot of research on the issues of de-concentration of assisted housing, and the relationship between subsidized housing/poverty and it relations to crime, and found that crime and rental housing go hand-in-hand, the effects of subsidized housing on correlation of public housing and its impact on property values.

Concerns are with the huge foreclosure problem and the potential for an even higher rate of rental properties in our community further eroding our quality of life and property values.

Robert suggested this Assn. to work with city government to enact some changes in the system.

Thus presenting a homeowners association with this sort of mission.


To improve the livability of the North side communities.
Mandating a change in the way subsidized housing is concentrated in at risk neighborhoods.
To maintain a manageable level of homeownership.
Prevent flight of responsible homeowners from Northside communities.
Create a safe and stable community.
Entice responsible homeownership and Landlords .
A conduit to meet-greet potential new homebuyers.

Who we are concerned citizens of Northside communities. Homeowners who are concerned about our community and want to promote and for the positive.
As homeowners in out community we have a vested interest in creating a safe, stable community.

-impacts of depreciating property values
-impacts of increased concentration of crime



Property Values as concerned homeowners.

A brief history lesson : When “the projects” (Hollman) were destroyed, 748 families were relocated. 1995 Property values were at rock bottom at that time and elderly population were moving and selling homes in 1996 & 97 for $36 and $40,000. Investors bought them and turned into subsidized and other rental property. Now we’re in foreclosure with some of those especially in last 3 years.

Barb interjected that in 2006 was first time property values went down. Up until and including 2005, valuation increases across the city and actually in 2005, realtor figures for sale prices, there were steady increases in Camden & Near north of 12% or so. Prices were increasing until 2006. Investor mania started in 2002/3 peaking in 2005 really had the effect of pushing prices upward. She went to a Federal Reserve meeting last Thursday and has a picture of what percentage of conventional loans that were done in Hennepin County, Mpls. & North and showed a graph … in 2002-2004, North Mpls. percentage of loans that were by investors was nearly 35% … buying was huge. Big part of our foreclosure problem is straw buyers. 70% of foreclosures are investors. Folwell has good records about properties that are transacted … there are records of people with 10 properties all being foreclosed.

Now the concern is that those foreclosed will go to investors AGAIN.

Roberta talked about the open houses on the foreclosed properties about to be auctioned. Competition is very slim. They visited about 60 properties some have been in hands of bank and are expended, stripped, abandoned for 2 years. People bought them and rented them out without investing anything into them. Flipping was 2000-2002 and now those properties are being sold at auction .Roberta wants to see a visible presence with signs, etc. “Landlord not welcome, homeowners hi” during these open houses to discourage more rental.

$11 million in Northside Home Fund w/Wells fargo & US Bank are up to $15/16 million now. Evaluation of everything on boarded list and decided which are being kept and which are being dozed. 350 on the list but probably hundreds more exist. Barb is asking for a list. $2,000 is charged to taxes of vacant/boarded homes to help recoup the cost of tearing down and has to be collected when the property changes hands..

Question: Why does it take so long to get them torn down? City is limited by titling and resources. $20,000 is average cost to tear a house down and is assessed to property and may be years before dollars are recouped.
Huge amounts of mortgage fraud happened in this neighborhood, downtown condos, New Prague, all over …

Robert suggests that NHA makes window cling stickers for the homeowners who are part of the association to aid in being a presence, also people realtors or perspective buyers could greet/meet, and aid is showing there are responsible people here.


Roberta: Discussed Folwell’ efforts with Project Green Streets, and the Folwell Center for Urban Initiatives . “We’re going to work block and block to make sure our homes and blocks to look good. We here can reach more one by one. There’s a huge inertia going on. We should be out in front of our homes more”. Neighbor: But it’s not safe.

Roberta: You have to know the people and be a presence though in the neighborhood.

This brought a discussion on communicating, and others agreed. Getting to know your neighbors goes a long way.

Concerns:
Rental – 42% of all section 8 rental unites in the City are concentrated in North Mpls. (barb has asked Public Housing to address it and they aid unless there’s a lawsuit filed like the Holman one, they cannot limit the number of Section 8 certificates. In Holman, city put a mandate that Northside would be 75% homeowner and 25% rental but Barb clarified that it was for a particular area. It was a settlement, all of those 748 families were given a section 8 voucher to take to areas which weren’t “impacted” they had to stay north of 33rd, etc. Some people took the certified and bought houses. Tracking mechanism is out of whack.

Solutions put forward:

Rental property license fees why not increase rental license fees they are $57. Make them more like $300
or perhaps a per room license fee, on property. The argument was made that so many city services are being used on these properties why not charge more. Which led to Barb saying A new Single Family Conversion fee, was presented as a change Barb Johnson is currently working on , a fee of $1000 to convert Rental license convert a single-family home from ownership to rental. In order to preserve owner occupied homes. We all agreed that would be a great idea.

What can be done to control problem landlords? North Mpls. has a high concentration of subsidized housing … from Rob’s research, there are direct links in city studies that high concentrations can directly be linked to crime at a rate of 60-80%.

Apartment buildings usually have a good management structure and they don’t want to unfairly penalize those owners. This would also require the property be inspected and brought up to code before being put into service .

Proposes the city develop a tennant escrow account to withhold payment to problem landlords. Barb said City has Tenant Remedies Act that City Attorney manages and has been strong in last couple years revoking rental licenses.

A suggestion was presented forward to reduce the fee of an unlawful Detainer, Landlords have to go through a lot of paperwork and expense to remove problem tenants. Robert suggested the fees be lowered and the system streamlined. Barb said that’s a County issue. Thus was moved to issues with state and county to be discussed later.

Some of the public housing properties are using the a lot of public resources like ambulances, social and economic assistance. For instance, fire trucks cost $1,000 per call. We feel it would be more fair to raise property taxes on rental properties to recoup some of those costs … again a county issue.

immediate revocation of rental license for every infraction.

And making the provisional license truly a provisional license, Barb commented that they were still 5 years behind in inspections for the licenses.


There’s a current moratorium on retail use. Rental property is a business, people are in it to make money, given that, why can’t we have a moratorium on that business.

Barb: Can’t moratorium on licensing but can for zoning.

Robert: Why can’t neighborhoods have a say in what businesses are on their blocks, i.e., rental properties, conveniences stores, etc.? why cant rental properties be treated as business’ whereby of you are in a residential n-hood you may need to get re zones with conditional use permit. Are not renting houses a business? With a conditional use permit you are required.to notify everyone within 350 feet and then it’s treated like a business with input from neighbors.

Barb will look into the possibility and legality of conditional use permit for rental properties.

Everyone agreed that there are good landlords and good tenants as well as a need for general and subsidized housing.

Robert asked Barb what she’d like to see us bring to the council as mandate for change.

Barb said we could be spokespeople for the Northside Homeowners in front of the council and help present a changing image of the community in order to entice homeownership.

Which led to a discussion of how as homeowners we should accentuate the positive and encourage homeownership.

And other things we could do as a homeowner association..




Short term idea for section 8 … is there any documentation that can be sent out to neighbors letting us know what violations are so neighbors know what to look for. It’s on the HUD website for a list of infractions. How about an insert in the water bill? Write HUD a letter saying we want the information made available to … they should produce it that we could use.

What if we call a public meeting and invite HUD to respond to our concerns?

Studies show that a concentration of 48 units of public housing per square mile causes significant social problems. . Barb guessed there are 2,500 HUD properties on the Northside that is 9 (?) square miles. Scattered site is a house that is owned by MPHA, there are 33 in 4th ward as part of Holman settlement. She understands that it is distributed throughout the city. Those units are usually well-managed and they can kick people out with real ease. Public Housing said they took 500 people off vouchers last year.

Why aren’t there more programs and incentives that encourage homeownership?
Discussed - the Northside home fund and other HUD programs.
Middle class people are footing the bill for a greater and greater slice of the population that is dysfunctional.


On the subject of Policing the youth, people agreed, Talking about the big problems vs.the smaller ones, too, ie, kids walking in street, public drinking, drug use. These need to be enforced before they become bigger problems.
Barb suggested we could also be a better watch over the court system . .

Barb suggested talking to the police about what we expect of them and they’ll respond.

On a discussion of the grass roots element, and how this would develop the association, it was asked who could we partner with?
Barb Johnson suggested we contact Northside Home Fund, Tom Fulton, for MN Family Housing Fund and is looking for initiatives to assist with. Other ideas taking this to one of the other umbrella orgs. like Camden Alliance of N-hoods or Northside N-hood Alliance?

We wanted to make sure were not doing anything redundant, in the community. it was agreed that being homeowners, gave us a distinct and unique voice as we are vested members who have a equity stake in our community.

Further discussions on development of NHA into an org, fiscal agency vs non profit, were tabled till later date

Steering Committee to help move forward: Connie, Jeanne, Robert, item was tabled until next time.

A call for volunteers to help in assisting moving forward as a steering committee was presented,

We urged all people attending to talk to other members of the community, and make them aware of the NHA, and what we could do as a unified voice.

Robbie suggests a blog, for Northside homeowners. .


“It’s hard to live here but there are a lot of success stories that we need to celebrate.”

A discussion developed around the Northside not being all bad, there are many success stories,
Homewood Studios, the Capri, PCYC, etc.. all through the Northside and we should make sure people are aware of these.

This turned to the media coverage of the Northside and it always presents the negatives..

Next Meeting Topic:
Robert suggests changing the rental issue will make the bigger impact and change.
And we should concentrate more effort on items we could
Retaining and recruiting responsible homeowners and encourage homeownership here.
Barb said to check all properties on your block and if there are non-licensed rentals to report them.
Connie will start working on a Handbook … tips on dealing with problems like strategies and resources.
Include child protection on the resource list.

Respectfully submitted,
Connie Beckers edit/ RJ
10/9/07

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

synopsis of NHA

Synopsis of the Northside Homeowners’ Association Initial Meeting, Monday, October 8, 2007

Who we are:
We are concerned citizens of the Northside communities. We are homeowners who are concerned about our community and want to promote it for the positive. As homeowners in North Minneapolis, we have a vested interest in creating a safe and stable environment.

We are concerned by the:
Impact of depreciating property values
Impact of increased concentration of crime, especially youth crime


We want:
To improve the livability of the Northside communities.
Mandate a change in the way subsidized housing is concentrated in at risk neighborhoods. Maintain manageable levels of homeownership vs rental property in the community.
Prevent flight of responsible homeowners from Northside communities.
Create a safe and stable community.
Entice responsible homeownership and landlords
Be a conduit to potential new homebuyers.

Some suggestions for change from our meeting:
Rental property license fees
Single Family Conversion fee
To reduce the fee of an unlawful detainer
Review tenant escrow account for problem landlords
Conditional use permit
City promote more homeownership programs for low income people


Next scheduled meeting:
Monday, October 22, 2007
Folwell Park Rec Center
Meeting room 3
6:30 to 8:30 p.m.

Northside Homeowners’ Association
Email: northsidehomeowners@gmail.com
Blog: http://northsidehomeowners.blogspot.com/